RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01588
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
The mailing address on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or
Discharge from Active Duty, be changed.
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
The mailing address on the DD Form 214 is incorrect and she fears
if any documents are sent to the address listed, her identity may
be stolen. The Board should find it in the interest of justice to
consider her untimely application to prevent her identity from
being stolen.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 24 Feb 04, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force.
On 23 Jul 09, the applicant received an honorable discharge. She
was credited with 5 years and 5 months of active service.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial. The need for a correction is
without merit as the document was accurate at the time of
publication and the address has already served its purpose and is
no longer used.
The sole purpose of the addresses in block 19 was for mailing the
DD Form 214. With the applicant already in possession of a DD
Form 214, the need for an address (or correction) is void as the
address has already served its purpose. Per governing directives,
DD Form 214 corrections are limited to two legitimized errors
before a new DD Form 214 is required. Unless other corrections
are warranted/directed, the requested correction to block 19 would
not be accomplished as it was correct at the time of publication,
that the address is no longer used and that the address does not
provide entitlements or benefits. In contrast, to correct the
document has greater impact to the individual and the protection
of DD Form 214 information; a correction would require the mailing
of documents referencing the old address to several supporting
veteran service agencies who must manually marry changes to
existing DD Forms 214.
The complete DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 30 May 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).
As of this date, no response has been received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.
3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took
notice of the applicants complete submission in judging the
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility
and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the
applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly
discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.
The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2014-01588 was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 7 Apr 14, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 29 Apr 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 30 May 14.AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01255
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01255 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, Block 4, Mailing Address, be corrected to reflect OH vice OK. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: There is a typographical error in the mailing address. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 05017
The personal information listed on the applicants DD Form 214 match all documents in her official military personnel record (Name, Social Security Number, Date of Birth, Home of Record at Time of Entry). Based on her signature throughout her military record, there is no evidence of her contesting her identity, personal information, or that the relative listed in Block 19b of her DD Form 214 not being valid. Exhibit E. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 16 Oct 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05542
His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with his 8 Aug 83 separation, Item 19, Mailing Address after Separation, be changed to San Antonio, TX. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial of the applicants request to change his mailing address after separation. The applicant failed to provide supporting documentation that the Florida address was in error.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04516
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-04516 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, blocks 19a/b be corrected to show his current address and current spouse and address. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR),...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 00115
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-00115 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His home of record (HOR) and permanent mailing address be changed from Los Angeles, CA to Texas (TX). ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04482
Block 17 be changed to indicate he was not provided all appropriate dental services prior to separation. On 8 Nov 12, AFPC/DPSIT directed the applicants DD Form 214, Block 14, Military Education, be changed to reflect (IVK) Underwater Egress Training, Nov 2008. On 23 Jun 13, SAF/MRBR directed the applicants DD Form 214, Block 20, Member Requests Copy 6 be Sent to California Director of Veterans Affairs, be changed to reflect No. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 04581
AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents is the governing directive for the DD Form 214 and it directs the name on the DD Form 214 be recorded as listed on the military members DD Form 4, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document-Armed Forces of the United States. In instances where a name change is effective after the publication of a DD Form 214, the applicants provide those agencies providing the benefit/entitlement or service their DD Form 214 as prepared and show legal documentation to explain the...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 01621
The time reflected in block 11 (Primary Specialty) of her DD Form 214 of 5 years and 10 months should be the same as the time (6 years) in block 12 (Record of Service). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D and E. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIPE recommends denial of the...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04091
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicants request for the AM w/5BOLC, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The evidence of record indicates the applicant was awarded the AM four times (basic award...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 03500
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOA evaluation is at Exhibit D. AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice concerning the applicants request for BMT Honor Graduate status or the SAEMR. A thorough review of the applicants official military personnel record revealed no documentation which establishes the applicant was awarded either the Basic Military Training Honor Graduate Ribbon or the SAEMR. Since the applicant received his DD Form 214, the...